Condition
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Editors: Jinnette Dawn Abbott MD, FACC, FSCAI; Eddy Lang MDCM, CCFP(EM), CSPQ; Peter Oettgen MD
Background Information
Description
- Thoracic aortic aneurysm is the permanent dilation of a segment of the thoracic aorta to ≥ 150% of its normal diameter.
Also Called
- TAA
Definitions
- Normal adult thoracic aortic diameters:
- Normal diameter increases with increasing age and body surface area.
- Normal diameter may vary by 0.2-0.4 cm depending on the method of visualization and if the aortic wall is included in the measurement.
- See approach to imaging thoracic aorta and reporting image results for guidance on accurately and reproducibly measuring aorta.
- Mean aortic diameters based on location and imaging modality used:
- Aortic root:
- In females, 3.5-3.72 cm on computed tomography (CT)
- In males, 3.63-3.91 cm on CT
- Reference - Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266
- Sinus of Valsalva:
- In females:
- 3-3.6 cm on echocardiography
- 2.8 cm on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)
- In males:
- 3.4-4 cm on echocardiography
- 3.2 cm on CMR
- In females:
- Sinotubular junction:
- In females:
- 2.6-3.2 cm on echocardiography
- 2.2 cm on CMR
- In males;
- 2.9-3.6 cm on echocardiography
- 2.5 cm on CMR
- In females:
- Ascending aorta:
- In males and females, 2.86 cm on chest x-ray (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266)
- In females:
- 2.7 cm on echocardiography
- 2.6 cm on CMR
- In males:
- 3 cm on echocardiography
- 2.7 cm on CMR
- Mid-descending aorta:
- In females:
- 2.45-2.64 cm on CT (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266)
- 2.5-2.6 cm on CMR
- In males:
- 2.39-2.98 cm on CT (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266)
- 2.4-3 cm on CMR
- In females:
- Diaphragmatic:
- In females, 2.4-2.44 cm on CT
- In males, 2.43-2.69 cm on CT
- Reference - Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266
- Aortic root:
- Pseudoaneurysm (also called false aneurysm) refers to dilation of the aorta due to disruption of all wall layers with extravasation of blood contained by periarterial connective tissue (not by the arterial wall). It is typically caused by blunt trauma or rapid deceleration from vehicle accidents, falls, or sports injuries (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266).
Types
- Types of thoracic aortic aneurysm based on location:
- The most common sites of involvement include:
- Aortic root, which is most common in Marfan syndrome
- Ascending aorta, which is proximal to the brachiocephalic artery
- Less common sites of involvement include:
- Transverse arch, which is involved in 10% of cases
- Descending thoracic aorta, which is distal to the left subclavian artery
- Thoracoabdominal aorta involves the thoracic aorta plus abdominal aorta
- Reference - Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266
- The most common sites of involvement include:
- Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm classification based on involving thirds of descending thoracic aorta:
- Type A: involves proximal third
- Type B: involves middle third
- Type C: involves distal third
- Type AB: involves proximal two-thirds
- Type BC: involves distal two-thirds
- Reference - Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266
- Thoracoabdominal aneurysm Crawford classification:
- Type I: extends from the proximal descending thoracic aorta (above T6) and extends to the renal arteries (upper abdominal aorta)
- Type II: extends from the proximal descending thoracic aorta (above T6) and extends to below the renal arteries
- Type III: extends from the distal descending thoracic aorta (below T6 but above diaphragm) and extends into the abdominal aorta
- Type IV: extends from below the diaphragm and involves the entire visceral aortic segment and most of the abdominal aorta
- Reference - Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266
Epidemiology
Who Is Most Affected
- The mean age at diagnosis is 69 years, however females tend to be significantly older at presentation than males (Mayo Clin Proc 2009 May;84(5):465).
Incidence/Prevalence
- STUDY SUMMARYincidence of degenerative nondissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm about 0.13% in Minnesota, United States from 1980 to 1994COHORT STUDY: JAMA 1998 Dec 9;280(22):1926
- STUDY SUMMARYannual incidence of combined thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection increased in Sweden between 1987 and 2002COHORT STUDY: Circulation 2006 Dec 12;114(24):2611
Risk Factors
- Hypertension (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266)
- Smoking (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266)
- Genetic disorders associated with medial degeneration, including:
- Marfan syndrome
- Bicuspid aortic valve
- Loeys-Dietz syndrome
- Turner syndrome
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) (vascular form)
- Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection syndrome
- Risk factors for mycotic thoracic aortic aneurysm include:
- IV drug use (Emerg Radiol 2014 Apr;21(2):191)
- Presence of potential sources of infection, including:
- Infective endocarditis
- Prosthetic valve endocarditis
- Infection contiguous to the aorta, such as vertebral osteomyelitis or gastroenteritis caused by salmonella
- Reference - Circulation 2016 Nov 15;134(20):e412
- Increased susceptibility to infection due to damage to endothelium caused by congenital abnormality, such as cystic necrosis or coarctation of aorta (Circulation 2016 Nov 15;134(20):e412)
Possible Risk Factors
- STUDY SUMMARYcurrent fluoroquinolone use associated with increased risk of thoracic aortic aneurysm and thoracic aortic dissectionSYSTEMATIC REVIEW: Am J Med 2017 Dec;130(12):1449
- STUDY SUMMARYcurrent, past, or any prior-year fluoroquinolone use associated with increased risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection and risk may be greater with longer duration of use, in patients > 70 years old, and in womenCASE-CONTROL STUDY: JAMA Intern Med 2015 Nov 1;175(11):1839
- STUDY SUMMARYoral fluoroquinolone use associated with increased risk of aortic aneurysm but not aortic dissection compared to amoxicillin useCOHORT STUDY: BMJ 2018 Mar 8;360:k678
- STUDY SUMMARYfluoroquinolone monotherapy may not increase risk of aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection compared to other antibiotic monotherapies in adults with infections where fluoroquinolone use is indicatedNESTED CASE-CONTROL STUDY: JAMA Intern Med 2020 Sep 8 early online
Associated Conditions
- Atherosclerosis
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in adults (Eur Heart J 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873)
- Diabetes mellitus (Eur Heart J 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873)
- Dyslipidemia (Eur Heart J 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873)
- Respiratory illness (Eur Heart J 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873)
- Other cardiovascular conditions, including:
- Bicuspid aortic valve
- Aberrant right subclavian artery
- Coarctation of the aorta
- Right aortic arch
- Reference - Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266
- Inflammatory diseases, including:
- Takayasu arteritis
- Giant cell arteritis
- Behcet syndrome
- Ankylosing spondylitis(Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266)
Etiology and Pathogenesis
Causes
- Most thoracic aortic aneurysms are caused by dilatation of the aorta due to degenerative disease of the media, but idiopathic aneurysms can occur (Circulation 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266).
Pathogenesis
- Thoracic aortic aneurysm formation involves medial degeneration characterized by all of the following:
- Disruption and loss of elastic fibers
- Loss of smooth muscle in the aortic media
- Increased deposition of proteoglycans
- Medial degeneration may initially be an adaptive response to wall stress in the aortic dilation zone.
Image 1 of 4
Aortic aneurysm
Gross specimen of a longitudinal section through a thoracic aorta with aneurysm.
Published by EBSCO Information Services. Copyright © 2025, EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission.
EBSCO Information Services accepts no liability for advice or information given herein or errors/omissions in the text. It is merely intended as a general informational overview of the subject for the healthcare professional.
DynaMed Levels of Evidence
Quickly find and determine the quality of the evidence.
DynaMed provides easy-to-interpret Level of Evidence labels so users can quickly find and determine the quality of the best available evidence. Evidence may be labeled in one of three levels:
1Level 1 (likely reliable) Evidence
2Level 2 (mid-level) Evidence
3Level 3 (lacking direct) Evidence
Grades of Recommendation
Guideline producers are now frequently using classification approaches for their evidence and recommendations, and these classifications are recognized and requested by guideline users. When summarizing guideline recommendations for DynaMed users, the DynaMed Editors are using the guideline-specific classifications and providing guideline classification approach when this is done.
Download the full version of Levels of Evidence