Condition

Mycoplasma Pulmonary Infections

Editors: Julio A. Ramirez MD; David M. Dobrzynski Jr. MD; Zbigniew Fedorowicz PhD, MSc, DPH, BDS, LDSRCS; Paritosh Prasad MD

American College of PhysiciansProduced in collaboration with American College of Physicians
Next Section >

Background Information

Description

  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia, and it is typically associated with mild disease with a persistent cough.,,,
  • Severe pneumonia, exacerbation of underlying pulmonary conditions, and extrapulmonary complications may occur in some patients.,,,
  • For information on the role of Ureaplasma in pulmonary disease in infants, see Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD).

Also Called

  • Walking pneumonia
  • Atypical pneumonia

Epidemiology

Incidence/Prevalence

Pneumonia
  • The incidence and prevalence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections is likely underestimated due to:
    • Its often asymptomatic or mild presentation
    • Lack of accurate diagnostic tests
    • Infections that mimic or coexist with M. Pneumoniae
  • M. pneumoniae is reported to cause 2%-40% of community-acquired pneumonia.,,,
    • 4%-8% of sporadic infection is reported to occur in adults
    • 20%-70% is reported to occur during epidemics
  • In the United States:
    • An estimated 2 million cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection occur annually, but because there is no national reporting or surveillance, the actual number is likely higher (CDC 2024 Oct 18).
    • In 2024, pulmonary infections caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae have been increasing in the United States, especially among young children (CDC 2024 Oct 17).
    • About 100,000 hospitalizations per year in adults in the United States are reportedly due to M. pneumoniae.
  • In China:
    • In September 2023, a high incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children were reported in several regions across China. Macrolide-resistantM. pneumoniae was reported to predominantly drive this outbreak. The real-time polymerase chain reaction assays of patients tested revealed the following positive detection rates for M. pneumoniae:
      • 25.4% in the outpatient setting
      • 48.4% in the inpatient setting
      • Up to 61.6% in patients with respiratory conditions
      • Reference - World J Pediatr 2024 Jan;20(1):1
    • STUDY SUMMARY
      M. pneumoniae detected in 14.4% of patients with respiratory tract infections in North China between 2011 and 2016
      COHORT STUDY: BMC Infect Dis 2018 Jul 17;18(1):335

    • STUDY SUMMARY
      M. pneumoniae detected in 3.7% of infants hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infections in China between 2012 and 2013
      COHORT STUDY: Respir Med 2015 Jun;109(6):751

Macrolide-Resistance
  • Macrolide-resistance was first reported in Japan in 2000, and has spread worldwide.,,
  • Reported rates of macrolide-resistant isolates vary by geographic area:
    • Almost 90% in Japan and China
    • Almost 30% in Italy and Israel
    • About 10% in Canada and the United States
    • < 1% in Slovenia and the Netherlands
  • STUDY SUMMARY
    in M. pneumoniae-positive specimens collected from children and adults with community-acquired infection from 2018 to 2020, macrolide resistance reported in 34% in Asia, 10% in Europe, and 9% in North America
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: J Antimicrob Chemother 2022 Aug 25;77(9):2353

  • STUDY SUMMARY
    macrolide resistance reported in 29% of Mycoplasma pneumoniae specimens from nonoutbreak infections and 7% of outbreak-associated infections in United States
    COHORT STUDY: J Clin Microbiol 2015 Jan;53(1):124

  • STUDY SUMMARY
    all M. pneumoniae isolates from patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Yantai, China, between 2015 and 2016 were macrolide resistant
    COHORT STUDY: Colomb Med (Cali) 2018 Jun 30;49(2):160

  • STUDY SUMMARY
    14.5% of M. pneumoniae isolates from children with community-acquired pneumonia in Japan between 2002 and 2006 were macrolide resistant
    COHORT STUDY: Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008 Jan;52(1):348

Risk Factors

  • Risk of infection is highest in patients aged 5-20 years.
  • Hypogammaglobulinemia is associated with an increased risk of Mycoplasma infections.
  • Sickle cell disease may be associated with increased disease severity.
  • The majority of outbreaks occur in crowded environments, including:,
    • Military barracks
    • Schools and universities
    • Hospitals
    • Long-term care facilities
  • See also Community-acquired Pneumonia in Adults and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children.

Associated Conditions

  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia often occurs in HIV-infected populations.
    • This is reported to cause 11%-21% of pneumonia in HIV infected individuals.
    • Children with HIV and M. Pneumoniae may have CD4 cell counts < 20 cells/mcL.
    • Antibody detection of M. Pneumoniae in patients with HIV is difficult due to an impaired immune response.
    • Immunosuppressed HIV-infected patients may never develop a detectable antibody response.
    • Reference - Pneumonia (Nathan) 2017;9:12

Etiology and Pathogenesis

Pathogen

  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae is 1-2 micrometers long and 0.1-0.2 micrometers wide, with cell volume < 5% of typical bacillus.,,
    • On agar plates, colonies resemble "fried eggs" with diameter typically ≤ 100 micrometers.
    • It lacks a cell wall, and is supported by sterols in a triple-layer cell membrane. Therefore, it is resistant to antimicrobials with activity against cell walls (such as beta-lactams) and Gram stain is ineffective.
    • It cannot be seen on light microscopy.
    • It is not found freely living in nature, and is predominantly considered a mucosal pathogen, existing parasitically on the epithelial surface of the host.
  • 2 genetic groups of mycoplasma have been identified and may determine the emergence of epidemics.
    • Subtype 1 and subtype 2 are differentiated based on difference in the P1 protein gene (repetitive elements of RepMP2/3 and RepMP4).
    • 1 subtype may intermittently emerge following induced transient herd immunity produced by the initial genetic subtype.

Transmission

  • Mycoplasma infections occur sporadically throughout the year, but may also occur as community outbreaks.,
  • Person-to-person transmission occurs through airborne droplets.,
  • Transmission typically occurs through close contact (mycoplasma are highly susceptible to drying out and becoming noninfective due to a lack of cell wall).,
  • The incubation period is typically 1-4 weeks.,

Pathogenesis

  • Disease manifestations may arise from:
    • Direct infection with mycoplasma at a site of inflammation and activation of local cytokines, including cold agglutinins to I-antigen of red blood cells
    • Indirect autoimmune and vascular complications
  • Attachment organelle play key role in adherence to host epithelial cells.
    • There is a specialized cellular structure that allows for cytoadherence.
    • The cytoskeletal proteins within the attachment organelle facilitate adherence and motility.
  • Once Mycoplasma pneumoniae binds to host tissue, an array of events leads to pathogenesis.,,
    • The metabolism of glycerol produces hydrogen peroxide and superoxide which injures epithelial cells and their cilia.
      • Denaturation of hemoglobin, peroxidation of lipids, and cell lysis can occur.
      • Oxidative stress in respiratory epithelium may result in damage to cilia.
    • Lipoproteins/lipopeptides induce Toll-like receptors TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6, leading to:
      • Amplified production of chemokines promoting lymphocyte and neutrophil trafficking
      • Lung inflammation
    • Community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) toxin may lead to inflammation and airway destruction as the following can occur:
      • Mycoplasma pneumoniae binds to human surfactant protein A and annexin A2 on airway epithelial cells, and after internalization leads to a range of events
      • Vacuolation and ciliostasis of host cells have been reported
      • Can stimulate expression of Th-2 cytokines and Th-2 chemokines causing eosinophilia, accumulation of T and B cells, and mucous metaplasia
      • Produces free radicals causing further cytotoxicity

Immune Response

  • Immunity lasts about 4 years (range 2-10 years).
  • Repeated infections are possible in the same patient.
Next Section >

Published by EBSCO Information Services. Copyright © 2025, EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission.

EBSCO Information Services accepts no liability for advice or information given herein or errors/omissions in the text. It is merely intended as a general informational overview of the subject for the healthcare professional.

DynaMed Levels of Evidence

Quickly find and determine the quality of the evidence.

DynaMed provides easy-to-interpret Level of Evidence labels so users can quickly find and determine the quality of the best available evidence. Evidence may be labeled in one of three levels:

1Level 1 (likely reliable) Evidence
Representing research results addressing clinical outcomes and meeting an extensive set of quality criteria which minimizes bias.
There are two types of conclusions which can earn a Level 1 label: levels of evidence for conclusions derived from individual studies and levels of evidence for conclusions regarding a body of evidence.
2Level 2 (mid-level) Evidence
Representing research results addressing clinical outcomes, and using some method of scientific investigation, but not meeting the quality criteria to achieve Level 1 evidence labeling.
3Level 3 (lacking direct) Evidence
Representing reports that are not based on scientific analysis of clinical outcomes. Examples include case series, case reports, expert opinion, and conclusions extrapolated indirectly from scientific studies.

Grades of Recommendation

Guideline producers are now frequently using classification approaches for their evidence and recommendations, and these classifications are recognized and requested by guideline users. When summarizing guideline recommendations for DynaMed users, the DynaMed Editors are using the guideline-specific classifications and providing guideline classification approach when this is done.

Download the full version of Levels of Evidence